![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| General News Discussion General News and Current Events discussion. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 247
|
Sometimes I ponder who we should be more concerned about... Al-Qaeda or China ?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070304/...ina_politics_2 Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We are now finding out that Rumsfeld wasn't off his rocker after all. Cheney has also been trying to raise the world's awareness about the Chinese military build-up.
There are millions of single men due to the old one-child policy who will never find a mate. What better use for them than to use them for military goals? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 103
|
Seriously if we don't get our economy to at least half of what it was in the 50s, China will soon be more powerful then us, economically and militarily(if thats a word)
__________________
Think you can trust the government? Ask an Indian! Merry Christmas, Kwanzaa, Hanakuh to all |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dans wrote: Seriously if we don't get our economy to at least half of what it was in the 50s...
The post-war boom that we enjoyed was due to the fact that Europe and Asia's industrial base (recall Japan's savage destruction of China in the 30's) was destroyed by the war and it took 35-40 years for them to get back on their feet. The demand for our products by the rest of the world was an artificial advantage based on Europe and Asia not being able to produce for themselves, thus leaving us the only game in town so to speak. While our industrial base was left intact after WW2, such was not the case for Europe and Japan. Now that the Asian countries have re-built their industrial base (and along with the labor advantage they enjoy due to their abundant population) they have re-gained the ground they would have had if it hadn't been for WW2. In short, while we thought we would have an indefinate economic advantage partly due to the war, partly due to the folly of the communist economic system, the fact is that once Mao passed and the failure of the Soviet system happened, they finally caught on to capitalism and are now giving us a run for our money. (no pun intended) |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Okolona, Ky.
Posts: 1,998
|
China rattlin' its saber...
China Lashes Out at Taiwan's UN Push, Proposed US Arms Sale September 17, 2007 - Beijing stepped up its Taiwan rhetoric over the weekend, condemning the island's leader for promoting a referendum on joining the United Nations and criticizing Washington for new plans to sell weaponry to Taipei clearly intended to defend it against potential Chinese attack. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Okolona, Ky.
Posts: 1,998
|
China building sophisticated military...
China's defense hikes not whole story: Gates Friday, March 7, 2008 - China's announced plans to increase its military budget by nearly 18 percent accounts for only part of its actual military spending, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Wednesday. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Okolona, Ky.
Posts: 1,998
|
Let's see how this turns out, before we go sellin' `em weapons that may end up in the hands of China...
State Department Holds $12 Billion Weapons Sales To Taiwan June 11, 2008 Washington, D.C. - The U.S. has frozen the sale of $12 billion worth of weapons to Taiwan as Washington gives way to peace talks between its Asian ally and China. Quote:
Taiwan remains resolute over US weapon-systems procurement 06 June 2008 - Taiwan's new minister of defence has said defence build-up continues to be necessary, in spite of talks with mainland China Quote:
__________________
$128/bbl. oil? Hmmm... okay, how about sellin' `em $128/bushel wheat? Last edited by waltky; 06-11-2008 at 04:37 AM. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|